Tested question: “best system product development”
ChatGPT does not mention linear
ChatGPT recommends siemens.com — not you.
Snapshot · 1 query · 1 engine · 1 run
Asked “best system product development”, ChatGPT named siemens.com, akkodis.com, zilex.de, mhp.com, sparxsystems.de, mevea.com — but not linear. These are the sources it reads and trusts instead of you.
- Full answer text — every word the AI said
- All engines: ChatGPT, Gemini & Perplexity
- 5–7 runs per query with a citation rate ± confidence
- The real render + the fix list to get cited
When someone asks an AI assistant about system product development, it recommends the names from the sources it can read and trust — linear is either among them or absent. Whether that happens depends on whether AI can actually read the site and trust the sources that mention it. A single live query is a snapshot — the full report tests ChatGPT and Gemini across multiple runs and shows exactly why linear is or isn’t cited.
Related check
Can AI crawlers even read linear.app?An AI crawler like GPTBot has to read your site before ChatGPT can ever cite it — check both.
Can AI crawlers actually read linear.app?
Before Google AI can cite a page, its crawler has to be able to fetch it. These are the live robots.txt and HTTP facts measured on this domain — not an estimate.
No AI crawler is blocked on linear. So being absent from the answer is not an access problem — it comes down to whether the content is quotable and the brand is a trusted source.
Measured per crawler
- GPTBotOpenAI (ChatGPT)accessibleaccessible
- ClaudeBotAnthropic (Claude)accessibleaccessible
- PerplexityBotPerplexityaccessibleaccessible
- Google-ExtendedGoogle (Gemini/Vertex)accessibleaccessible
- CCBotCommon Crawl (Trainingsdaten)accessibleaccessible
- anthropic-aiAnthropic (Legacy-Token)accessibleaccessible
Crawler facts measured on 2026-08-12